Memory Networks

Abstract: We describe a new class of learning models called memory networks. Memory networks reason with inference components combined with a long-term memory component; they learn how to use these jointly. The long-term memory can be read and written to, with the goal of using it for prediction. We investigate these models in the context of question answering (QA) where the long-term memory effectively acts as a (dynamic) knowledge base, and the output is a textual response. We evaluate them on a large-scale QA task, and a smaller, but more complex, toy task generated from a simulated world. In the latter, we show the reasoning power of such models by chaining multiple supporting sentences to answer questions that require understanding the intension of verbs.

Preview

PDF Thumbnail

Synopsis

Overview

  • Keywords: Memory Networks, Question Answering, Neural Networks, Inference, Long-term Memory
  • Objective: Introduce a new class of models called memory networks that integrate inference components with a long-term memory component for improved reasoning and question answering.
  • Hypothesis: Memory networks can effectively utilize a long-term memory component to enhance the performance of question answering systems compared to traditional models.
  • Innovation: The introduction of a structured memory component that allows for dynamic reading and writing, enabling the model to perform complex reasoning tasks through iterative memory access.

Background

  • Preliminary Theories:

    • Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs): Traditional models that process sequences but struggle with long-term dependencies and memorization tasks.
    • Associative Memory Networks: Models that provide content-addressable memory but lack compartmentalization and structured memory management.
    • Neural Turing Machines: A model that combines neural networks with a large, addressable memory but focuses on algorithmic tasks rather than language and reasoning.
    • Memory-based Learning: Approaches that store examples in memory for nearest neighbor classification, but do not perform reasoning or iterative memory access.
  • Prior Research:

    • 2010: Introduction of memory-based models for natural language processing tasks.
    • 2014: Development of Neural Turing Machines, proposing a memory-augmented neural network architecture.
    • 2014: Research on using embeddings and neural networks for question answering, highlighting the limitations of traditional approaches.
    • 2015: Emergence of models that integrate memory and reasoning, paving the way for memory networks.

Methodology

  • Key Ideas:

    • Memory Structure: A memory array that can be read from and written to, facilitating dynamic knowledge storage.
    • Component Functions:
      • I (Input Feature Map): Converts incoming input into an internal representation.
      • G (Generalization): Updates memory based on new inputs, allowing for memory compression and generalization.
      • O (Output Feature Map): Produces output features based on the current memory state and input.
      • R (Response): Converts output features into the desired response format.
  • Experiments:

    • Large-scale QA Task: Evaluated on a dataset of 14 million statements, assessing the model's ability to retrieve and utilize relevant memories for answering questions.
    • Simulated World QA: A controlled environment where characters interact, requiring the model to understand context and perform multi-step reasoning.
    • Unseen Word Modeling: Tested the model's ability to handle previously unseen words during inference.
  • Implications: The methodology allows for efficient memory management and reasoning capabilities, making it suitable for complex tasks requiring contextual understanding.

Findings

  • Outcomes:

    • Memory networks significantly outperform traditional RNNs and LSTMs in both large-scale and simulated QA tasks.
    • The ability to generalize and handle unseen words enhances the model's robustness and applicability.
    • Memory hashing techniques improve efficiency in memory retrieval, allowing for faster processing without sacrificing accuracy.
  • Significance: Memory networks represent a substantial advancement over previous models by integrating structured memory management with neural network capabilities, addressing limitations in handling long-term dependencies.

  • Future Work: Exploration of more sophisticated memory management techniques, integration with other domains (e.g., vision), and application to more complex reasoning tasks.

  • Potential Impact: Advancements in memory networks could lead to significant improvements in natural language understanding, question answering systems, and other AI applications requiring contextual reasoning and memory utilization.

Notes

Meta

Published: 2014-10-15

Updated: 2025-08-27

URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.3916v11

Authors: Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, Antoine Bordes

Citations: 1632

H Index: 175

Categories: cs.AI, cs.CL, stat.ML

Model: gpt-4o-mini